Online Store
Available: December 2025
Pre-Orders Open Now
Delivery: mid/end DEC 2025
Helmed by General Editor, Cavinder Bull S.C., this publication is annotated by some
of the pre-eminent practitioners in the field.
It is the leading title of its kind, presenting the most comprehensive coverage of
Singapore Civil Procedure in both print and electronic format. This title provides the
new Rules of Court in an annotated format and supplies supporting legislation and
other material of significance.
Developments Since Last Edition
Every Order reviewed and updated since 2022
Updates on recent cases including:
• Group Lease Holdings Pte Ltd (in liquidation) and another v Group Lease Public Co
Ltd [2025] 3 SLR 1315, clarifies the applicable tests for the grant of mandatory and
Mareva injunctions.
• Wuhu Ruyi Xinbo Investment Partnership (Ltd Partnership) v European Topsoho
Sàrl [2025] SGCA 32, deals with whether proportionality applies when deciding
whether to enforce an unless order following an intentional breach.
• L’Oreal and another v Shopee Singapore Pte Ltd [2025] 4 SLR 145 provides
guidance on adequate or sufficient disclosure in response to an order to produce
information, and disclosure standards for platform operators.
• Deutsche Bank AG Singapore Branch v ARJ Holding and another [2025] SGHC
163, covers whether agreed contractual interest rates can continue post-judgment
even where not expressly stipulated.
• Madison Pacific Trust Ltd and others v David Salim and another [2025] 4 SLR
1512, deals with the scope of the Court’s power to appoint a receiver under section
4(10) of the Civil Law Act 1909 (2020 Rev Ed).
• COSCO Shipping Specialized Carriers Co, Ltd v PT OKI Pulp & Paper Mills and
others [2025] SGHC 87 discusses the meaning of a party having an “interest in the
appeal” and when that party ought to be served.
• Zhong Renhai and others v Goh Sock Ngee and others [2025] SGHC 43 analysed
dispensing with notice requirements for an ex parte injunction application where the
application concerns fungible assets that could easily be dissipated through
internet banking.
• Lew Huay Jiun Isabelle and another v Lee Yu Ru Michael and another [2025]
SGHC 1 comments on the court’s discretion to apply the Ladd v Marshall test to
appeals that do not arise from a judgment after trial or a hearing on the merits.

